Ccot Roman 100-600 Ad

Roman Empire experienced division and unity of the empire with the contribution of religion, and language. The government of the Roman Empire had more or less stayed the same through 100 CE and 600 CE. The system was called the Roman Republic where the male citizens of the Roman Empire elected their leaders. In this system, there were senates, consuls, tribunes, perfects, and an Assembly of all male who were free and were Roman citizenship. During the reign of Diocletian in the Roman Empire, the Roman Empire was greatly impacted by the action of Diocletian. When Diocletian entered his reign, he realized that the Roman Empire was becoming too big for one person to rule and decided that he will split the empire in half into the Eastern and Western Roman Empire in 284 AD, making it more manageable to rule. Although the Empire was divided, the two empires supported and help each other. However, in 376, 410, and 468 CE their northern adversaries had launched an attack on the Empire, which made the empires unable to support one another. As time passed, the division between the empires grew and led to more independence. Later on in 306 AD, a civil war called the Civil Wars of the Tetrarchy occurred between the Eastern and Western Roman Empire which lasted for 18 years. The leader of the Eastern half was Maxentius who was power-hungry had planned to kill leader of the western half, Constantine, by creating a rebellion. Because of Maxentius’ lust for wealth, it led to war. In the end of civil war, Constantine won and the empire was united again. However after Constantine’s death in 337, the empire was divided again by his sons. Christianity had a huge impact on the Roman Empire. In the beginning, Romans were polytheistic and believed that the gods were the reason for many things. However Christianity began to spread throughout the Roman Empire and many people began to convert. The emperor Diocletian in 303demanded that they will comply with the traditional Roman religious practices, if not they will be persecuted. Although most of the Christian in their community did deny their faith and worshipped the Roman gods, some Christians would not hesitate to announce their faith in front of a whole Assembly. Though many Christians were persecuted, Christianity rapidly grew because of the nfluence of many great Christians and the benefits of being one such as life after death in Heaven instead of the Underworld. In 313 AD, Constantine announced that Christianity is allowed in the empire in the Edict of Milan. The reason why he allowed Christianity was that before the Battle of Milvian Bridge he saw a cross of light in the sky with words that said, â€Å"By this, wi n! † He placed this sign on every shield and the end of the battle, he won. Not only Christianity was allowed in the empire, but made into the official religion of the Roman Empire by Theodosius in 380. Before the division of the Roman Empire, Latin was the main language of Rome for the Virgil emphasizes it as the source of Roman unity and tradition. Latin was used to write law and birth certificate. However when the empire was divided, the Eastern Roman Empire favored the language of the Greeks considering the fact that many Greeks immigrated to the Roman Empire. With the spread of Christianity, slow diffusion of the Greek language, and the divinity and unity of the empire during 100 AD through 600 AD, it had affected the Roman Empire greatly.

Commercial Law - Sales of Goods Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Commercial Law - Sales of Goods - Essay Example Emily accepted this proposal and handed over the scarf to Andrea for cleaning. Christine, who saw the scarf in the shop, instantly decided to purchase the scarf. Accordingly, she offered a very lucrative amount for it. Andrea accepted this offer and gave the scarf to Christine. Later on Emily came to know of this transaction and made a strong resolve to get back her scarf from Christine. Issues For advising Emily and Christine in respect of their rights regarding the possession of the scarf, the issues to be addressed are: Whether there was a contract of sale between Andrea and Emily. Whether Andrea possesses title to the scarf which was sold to Christine. Whether Emily got any remedy under the provisions of sale of goods Act. Whether Christine’s sale transaction with Andrea is a legally valid one. Rule of law As per the provisions of section 2(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, a contract of sale is one in which the seller either transfers or accepts to sell the property in go ods to another person called the buyer for a consideration which can be termed as price. As per section 21 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, an individual without title in the goods cannot transfer the same to others Application Since, Emily had paid for the scarf and taken possession, she had become its owner, as per the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act 1979. Thus, she possesses title to the property. ... In bailment, mere possession of the goods is given and there is no transfer of property in the goods. A bailment involves a transfer of possession in the goods. On the other hand, a sale results in the transfer of the general property in the goods. In instances, wherein there is a hire purchase agreement or a return transaction, the bailee may obtain property in the goods from the bailor (Macleod, 2002, p. 22). The bailor has the right to claim a return of the goods bailed, the moment that the purpose of such bailment has been realised. In the event of any delay by the bailee in returning these goods, the bailor can claim compensation. The remedy for failure by the bailee to take proper care of the goods is damages. On occasion, the risk and property in goods sold could have been transferred to the buyer and the seller could be duty bound to deliver goods to the buyer. In such instances, any ensuing damage to the goods resulting from the negligence of the seller has to be compensated for by the provision of damages to the buyer (Title and Passing of Property). However, in such cases, the buyer cannot reject the goods. As such, in a contract of bailment, the goods are delivered with the condition that the goods are to be returned to the owner or some other party. Despite the fact that the holder of the goods in a contract of bailment possesses certain obligations and rights, the title in the goods does not pass to that person (Sale of goods: contract, property and risk). The bailee does not hold good title, since property in goods is not transferred. Section 21(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, enjoins a general rule. This rule declares that it is not

The price of diamonds is too high Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The price of diamonds is too high - Essay Example Before the 19th century, diamond minerals were known to be rare as it was found in India and Brazil. During 1870 large mines for diamond deposits were discovered in South Africa at place near orange. Such became a threat to the few diamond producers despite the large supply thus made the commodity a luxury instead of a commodity. At the year 1888, a body was formed known as De Beers Consolidated mines in South Africa by suppliers in order to secure a high market for diamond prices. Initially, diamond cartel controlled successfully the supply worldwide regulation done at mine output and purchase of the exclusive right to mining nations across Africa. At the onset of 20th century, DE beers dominated around 90 percent trade for diamond internationally. In 1930, there was a decline in the diamond demand, causing the son of De beers to initiate an advertising agency that incorporated an advertising strategy to target young men in order to purchase a ring for engagement in order to become a form of acceptance during courtship declaration. Through such strategy, diamond price rose, unlike other minerals. Currently, the cartel dominates in approximately two thirds of the diamond (Diamond, 1971). According to pricing theory consideration, is on economic activity due to creation and transfer of value. That covers the trading of goods and services on economic agents that are distinctive. Such explains the high cost of the diamond in comparison with water .this depends on the utility of particular purpose and purchasing power of goods that the object possesses. Such is known as the value exchange and uses in value. Minerals such as diamond derive its value due to scarcity nature and labour intensity required to extract such minerals. The labour involved forms a basic unit the exchange process of value of goods. That will be of great significance to determine overall prices. Thus, the nominal price according to Bagweel & Riordan (1991) has a